Well, it predates tailwind, and in many ways beat out bootcrap when it came to the crown for stupidity... but tailwind REALLY seized that crown away by taking the worst of both and running with it, and then even BRAGGING that it violates best practices.

But yeah, 'tis from the sleazy predatory "continues to pretend to have something to do with the W3C despite decades of being told to cut that **** out" disaster that is W3Fools... so... yeah. It's bad.

Though at least they did finally seven or eight years ago add a disclaimer saying they are not in any way, shape, or form involved with the W3C. Shame it's buried on some sub-page nobody would ever actually visit.