That's not entirely something I miss, it instead makes e ask a question.

Why is writing MORE code helping "rapidly prototype", unless by that folks mean "blindly copy some existing code." If the latter, why can't they just blindly copy working hTML and CSS instead of bloated rubbish that has so many flaws from a usability, accessibility, efficiency, and ease of creation/maintaining standpoint?

That's why the argument "It's for people who can't be bothered with HTML or CSS" is such nonsense... becuase they're still copying or working with the HTML and using classes to write more code than it would be as CSS... with as many classes if not MORE to learn than the entirety of CSS itself?

For the people who make these "components" and other crap how is that "easier", and for people who blindly copy it, how is it better to work with?

All the claims like that about "rapid prototyping" seem rooted in lies and bunko.

Is it just there's no central repository for well written inter-compatible pre-built HTML components for the copypasta idiots to use? Wait... it can't be that simple? Can it?!?