Jason Knight
1 min readJun 15, 2023

--

Still looks like taking a giant steaming dump on the markup with endless pointless idiotic "classes for nothing".

Atomic, utility, whatever you want to call it, it's violating the most basic of good HTML practices, dialing development techniques back in time 25 years, pissing on caching models, and in general reeking of everyone involved in CREATING these systems not being qualified to write a single blasted line of HTML in the first blasted place!

Hell placing hover states on non-focusable elements alone is proof enough of that.

This PAGE:

https://anirudh-munipalli.github.io/zindacss-documentation/documentation/height.html

Is proof that these clowns have ZERO damned business telling people how to use HTML or CSS!

Thus when people say "All this can be done by adding a few classes" I automatically know they aren't qualified to say a blasted thing about using HTML properly. Just more monuments to the HTML 3.2 mentality. Emphasis on the "mental"

As evidenced by mentioning the "thousands of articles" bandwagon fallacy!

Millions of people believe all sorts of batshit crazy nonsense. Doesn't make them right.

--

--

Jason Knight
Jason Knight

Written by Jason Knight

Accessibility and Efficiency Consultant, Web Developer, Musician, and just general pain in the arse

No responses yet