And say hello to more examples of why HTML/CSS frameworks are incompetent trash.

Little to no proper semantics or logical structure, gibberish use of heading depths, endless pointless PRESENTATIONAL classes for nothing other than code bloat, broken responsiveness for non-standard font size users...

It's hardly a shock it makes people write as much if not more code than they'd have without the framework, NOT counting the framework itself against the size total. Even something as simple as that little CTA area goes full Pakled, So simple that "responsive" isn't even something to brag about given that normal flow from 1997 would handle that. Probably in less code.

Seriously, what the **** makes the sentence under the actual heading the start of a new subsection? Much less how can you start a depth five subsection with no depth four for it to mark the start of a subsection of?!? Much less what in blazes is that doing to warrant a double wrapper and flex?!? Nothing like 665 bytes of markup and some fatass library to do 200 bytes of markup and 250 bytes of CSS' job, whilst pissing on the entire reason CSS and semantic markup exists from orbit.

Again, proof positive the clowns who CREATE these HTML/CSS frameworks -- much less the suckers duped into using them -- are utterly unqualified to write a single blasted line of HTML! No wonder I keep having clients where their sites are vomiting up 200-500k of HTML to do 24-48k of markup's flipping job!

But sure, keep telling me how much "easier" this is to maintain or collaborate with others on... BARF.